Siena.


We showed up without a booking for our two nights, which was probably a mistake, and we compounded it by spending some hours to park and walk into town to get advice from the visitor information center. They were nice enough, but in the end they could find nothing for us in town and we were sent to a outlying village for our lodgings. The "agriturismo" there turned out to be more like a small hotel in a country setting - just far enough out in the country, it turned out, that we were miles from any place to buy our lunch or dinner. The owner was a very nice gentleman who quickly decided we possessed enough Italian to be worthy fairly lengthy conversation, and after showing us our apartment (out of rooms, he said, so take this flat for the same price) he introduced us to his hunting dogs and we made small talk about my italian heritage, etc. Our rooms were clean and modern, with a full living room, kitchen, and full bath with tub/shower; the drawbacks - there must be some, always - the TV had no sound; but the upstairs neighbors had plenty: apparently a family with some number of small children who bawled well they were unhappy (usually) and ran back and forth across the floors when they were pleased. The wife had a sharp tongue, with which she would berate someone (her husband?) for long periods in the morning. Fortunately we weren't around too much.
Ah Siena. It is now celebrated as the number 2 destination in Tuscany, after Florence, and it shows. Here in late September, there are still huge crowds, mostly German and Americans, many moving through the city in bus-sized tour groups. Although it does not process the same numbers as Florence, it seems to do it less gracefully: in the historical center of town it feels as though the function of the place is given over to the service of tourism, most especially with the shops and restaurants, and it is difficult to see any normal city life taking place. It is essentially tourists watching tourists.
Unlike Florence or Venice, it is a bit unclear what exactly the tourists have come to see. The city itself is attractive enough, but not in any unique way, really; it's quite like a huge Volterra, or Orvieto, or a large version of any of a dozen hill towns. Certainly, as an historical political entity, it ranks right up there, but...what else? Well, to be fair, the Duomo is amazing. Nancy and I had seen it on a previous trip, and we elected not to stand in line again, but to concentrate instead on the "important" museums.
What to say about Sienese painting? Volume over quality? A well-spring of mediocrity? At best, it succeeds in being naively charming by some accident of primitive draughtsmanship or a curious and arcane subject matter; normally, though, it seems a half-hearted imitation of Bottecelli, or Titan, or Caravaggio, and almost invariably stiff and graceless - sometimes even grotesque and cartoonish. We didn't like it.
In the end we tracked down a few things that intrigued. They weren't featured in the literature, really, and mostly they were underground in one sub-basement or another. First, we found the works of the Duomo museum, where they put the worn original statues from the cathedral (now replaced with fakes) and cast-off altarpieces, prayer books, chalices, robes, hats, etc., and some nifty reliquaries (skulls, and various body parts of saints, in silver-and-glass containers -strange, because one would think these objects would forever rate being inside a church somewhere). Then, in a basement of the Muncipal buidling, we found a couple rooms with some good 19th-century italian realist painting. Lastly, we found some pots. The "Antiquities" museum, several levels below one of the standard tourist venues, was remarkable not so much for its contents but for the amazing underground labyrinth in which they were housed - cool.
Nancy bought some shoes and we got out of town.